| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 18:58:29 -0800 (PST) From: Vadim Antonov <avg@exigengroup.com> To: Rafi Sadowsky <rafi-nanog@meron.openu.ac.il> Cc: <nanog@merit.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0211150112160.11507-100000@meron.openu.ac.il> Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Rafi Sadowsky wrote: > VA> > 2) There is a lack of a killer app requiring peering every 100 sq Km. > VA> > VA> Peering every 100 sq km is absolutely infeasible. Just think of the > VA> number of alternative paths routing algorithms wil lhave to consider. > VA> > VA> Anything like that would require serious redesign of Internet's routing > VA> architecture. > > What about: > > IPv6 with hierarchial(sp?) geographical allocation ? > > BGP with some kind of tag limiting it to <N> AS hops ? > ( say N=2 or N=3? ) I can think of several ways to do it, but all of them amount to significant change from how things are being done in the current generation of backbones. --vadim
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |