[53334] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Breaking Stuff by Fixing NAT
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Mon Nov 11 22:27:03 2002
To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 11 Nov 2002 16:04:07 PST."
<20021112000407.GA79793@blossom.cjclark.org>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 22:26:23 -0500
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_263382334P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002 16:04:07 PST, "Crist J. Clark" <crist.clark@attbi.com> said:
> Has anyone here been in a similar situation? Did turning off NAT break
> anything? Is anyone aware of or can think of anything that turning off
> NAT might break? (Ignore the fact any customers connected during the
If the users have been getting a static address in the 10/8 range, they may
have it hardcoded someplace. If they've been getting their address/netmask/
DNS/etc via DHCP, then they'd already have discovered it breaks when they
hardcode it since the next time they connect they'll be up a creek.
--
Valdis Kletnieks
Computer Systems Senior Engineer
Virginia Tech
--==_Exmh_263382334P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQE90HTecC3lWbTT17ARAlmXAKC62ms1BDWHreicIOI8hF5uYy9pfQCfb7Kq
iQC6VQMI9CI75vb+gbFgEkY=
=1+b3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_263382334P--
