[53137] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ISDN tip wanted
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jim Segrave)
Fri Nov 1 05:42:19 2002
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 11:41:39 +0100
From: Jim Segrave <jes@nl.demon.net>
To: Ian MacKinnon <ian@teliauk.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Reply-To: jes@nl.demon.net
Mail-Followup-To: Jim Segrave <jes@nl.demon.net>,
Ian MacKinnon <ian@teliauk.com>, nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <3DC14F85.7060103@teliauk.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Thu 31 Oct 2002 (15:43 +0000), Ian MacKinnon wrote:
>
> And it was positive advice, rather than my not offering anything :)
> What is the signalling doing at the other end ?
> What I'm not sure about is what the different call references are about ?
> The setup has a call ref of 0x01
> But the Call Processing has 0x81
> The far end then sends a disconnect
Maybe Niel's right and it's a 56K with embedded signalling vs. 64K
with separate signalling.
Or maybe it's the parity. Afer all, 0x81 is 7bit even :-)
--
Jim Segrave jes@nl.demon.net
