[52927] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [NANOG-LIST] Sprint VS. Qwest
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Chris Woodfield)
Wed Oct 23 14:14:53 2002
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 14:07:52 -0400
From: Chris Woodfield <rekoil@semihuman.com>
To: Brent Van Dussen <vandusb@attens.com>
Cc: "Christopher K. Neitzert" <chris@neitzert.com>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20021016162658.038317f8@staff.attens.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
"Dude, where's the core?"
(ducks)
-C
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 04:27:46PM -0700, Brent Van Dussen wrote:
>=20
> The latest (april 2002) Skitter data shows sprint being slightly closer t=
o=20
> the internet core than qwest.
>=20
> Check it out:
>=20
> http://www.caida.org/analysis/topology/as_core_network/pics/ascoreApr2002=
.gif
>=20
> -Brent
>=20
> At 04:23 PM 10/16/2002, Christopher K. Neitzert wrote:
>=20
> >List,
> >
> >Neither Sprint nor Qwest are serious about earning my business and are n=
ot
> >providing me with their network peering details. I was hoping that the
> >list might have the collective resources to help me determine who has
> >better peering.
> >
> >thanks
> >
> >chirstopher
> >
> >
> >--
> >Christopher K. Neitzert / 0xC10D222F / chris@neitzert.com
>=20
>=20
--IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9tuV4qP/YiunDNcERAnDtAKCysOb2WILQHK++nERxHclqz7RQxgCcCfiq
+JRXUsdwMkENVGBMbor7OgM=
=dJQt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o--
