[5287] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Internet II is coming...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tim Salo)
Mon Oct 14 10:30:28 1996
From: salo@msc.edu (Tim Salo)
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 09:15:36 -0500 (CDT)
To: fkittred@biddeford.com
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: Re: Internet II is coming...
> Date: Wed, 09 Oct 1996 17:20:17 -0400
> From: Fletcher E Kittredge <fkittred@biddeford.com>
>
> On Wed, 9 Oct 1996 12:13:03 -0700 (PDT) Michael Dillon wrote:
> > My ISP has a 10Mbps fibre ATM circuit to BCNet in Vancouver that was
> > installed in Aplril 1995. From there it connects to CA*Net which has a T3
> > into MCI Seattle as well as links to the East where more T3's head south
> > to MCI. The T3's were T1's until Sept 1995 at which point there was a
> > small improvement in speed at times.
>
> So a 10Mbps fiber ATM circuit translates, after the cell tax and
> packet stredding, to 6Mbps on a real link. Is this not slow enough to
> be a bottleneck?
And, an OC-12c ATM circuit can provide nearly 540 Mbps of TCP
data, after SONET, ATM, IP and TCP overheads.
Perhaps, I missed your point...
-tjs
