[52847] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Sprint VS. Qwest
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Richard A Steenbergen)
Fri Oct 18 17:44:38 2002
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 17:44:06 -0400
From: Richard A Steenbergen <ras@e-gerbil.net>
To: dgold <dgold@FDFNet.Net>
Cc: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve@telecomplete.co.uk>,
"Christopher K. Neitzert" <chris@neitzert.com>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20021018121137.U63895-100000@paradox.fdfnet.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 12:18:47PM -0500, dgold wrote:
>
> Both Sprint and Qwest are, most would agree, transit-free, "tier 1"
> networks. They interconnect with all other similarly large networks. How
> much more do you want? The size of their interconnections to 701? I'm not
> sure how that is useful.
http://west-boot.mfnx.net/traffic/sjc/sjc-sprint-oc3.html
http://west-boot.mfnx.net/traffic/iad/iad-sprint-oc3.html
http://west-boot.mfnx.net/traffic/chi/chi-sprint.html
http://west-boot.mfnx.net/traffic/nyc/nyc-sprint.html
http://west-boot.mfnx.net/traffic/lax/lax-sprint.html
'cause yeah, no "tier 1" has ever run congested to another, right?
--
Richard A Steenbergen <ras@e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
PGP Key ID: 0x138EA177 (67 29 D7 BC E8 18 3E DA B2 46 B3 D8 14 36 FE B6)
