[52776] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: sprint passes uu?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Richard A Steenbergen)
Tue Oct 15 17:40:54 2002
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 17:40:21 -0400
From: Richard A Steenbergen <ras@e-gerbil.net>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <200210152125.g9FLPL4N010612@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 05:25:21PM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
>
> Well.. yeah.. but my hypothetical 64 /8's are twice address space than
> your hypothetical 2,097,152 /24's.
Of course, but it's still a metric I see getting tossed about.
> About the only conclusion that you can *safely* draw is that Sprint has
> a more complicated network than UU does. Now *hopefully*, they have
> more customers too, or the Sprint backbone engineers will have to carry
> a much higher complexity/customer ratio, which means when the senior
> engineers finally snap under the pressure, we'll get junior engineers
> making weird work-arounds that will just complicate things 5 years down
> the road.
Or that they peer with even less people than UU does, and force people to
buy transit. But it makes an interesting point about that mythical "50% of
the internet" people talk about with regards to Worldcom, a lot of it is
the same routes, and the amount of single homed customers is a lot less.
--
Richard A Steenbergen <ras@e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
PGP Key ID: 0x138EA177 (67 29 D7 BC E8 18 3E DA B2 46 B3 D8 14 36 FE B6)
