|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 12:35:03 +0200 From: Niels Bakker <niels=nanog@bakker.net> To: nanog@merit.edu Mail-Followup-To: nanog@merit.edu In-Reply-To: <20021009074704.200FA398C2@equinox.DOMINO.ORG> Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu * jimpop@rocketship.com (Jim Popovitch) [Wed 09 Oct 2002, 05:48 CEST]: > Does anyone have any real references for Smarts? Seems like all they > have are partners and sales to companies that buy one of everything. > Any one willing to use their company email address and state that they > use Smarts? Saying that it is wonderful from bakker.net and domino.org > doesn't lend it much credibility. ;) That's mostly a matter of habit and ease-of-use; my NANOG subscription so far outlasts my previous three employments. ;) SMARTS scalability? Thousands and thousands of ports monitored... from what I recall from certain documentation, 2,000 ports is `good', 5,000 is `doable' and 25,000 is `too many' (for a single installation). * neil@DOMINO.ORG (Neil J. McRae) [Wed 09 Oct 2002, 09:54 CEST]: > Jim, I work for COLT, we use SMARTS across our entire IP network. > http://www.colt.net/ Yes, the course that I mentioned I followed in my earlier mail was together with one of your colleagues... there were experienced and very clueful people from Cable & Wireless UK, COLT, Interoute and GlidePath (me) at that training. All of these companies are actively using SMARTS and broadening the scope of their implementation. Cheers, -- Niels.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |