[52562] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: UUNET Routing issues
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Fri Oct 4 16:54:17 2002
To: Petri Helenius <pete@he.iki.fi>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 04 Oct 2002 22:28:01 +0300."
<04e201c26bdc$2775bd80$8c2a40c1@PHE>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 16:53:26 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_164032090P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Fri, 04 Oct 2002 22:28:01 +0300, Petri Helenius said:
> You usually end up with 64k window with modern systems anyway. Hardly
> anything uses window scaling bits actively. Obviously by dropping select packets
> you can keep the window at a more moderate size. Doing this effectively would
> require the box to regocnize flows which is not feasible at high speeds.
> (unless you're caspian sales person :-)
OK. I'll bite - is it feasible if you're a caspian engineer? ;)
--==_Exmh_164032090P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQE9nf/GcC3lWbTT17ARAuLIAJwI6NSc2EdM8icuMF0yaCDmi7auHACg9ivp
HRl8+5Hj84Y9szWoE93MSmQ=
=WU40
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_164032090P--
