[52467] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NANOG ISP Security BOF
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sean Donelan)
Wed Oct 2 18:21:28 2002
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 18:19:25 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sean Donelan <sean@donelan.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20021002170419.Y57906-100000@paradox.fdfnet.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, dgold wrote:
> Why would you want peering coordinators to speak at a Security BOF? I
> would think that you would want network engineers who are knowledgable in
> backbone security techniques to speak. The interaction of this set to the
> set of peering coordinators tends to be rather weak - not nonexistant,
> just not very significant.
I think its an issue of who comes to NANOG. We want the security folks to
come to the BOF. But if they aren't at NANOG, peering coordinators
are a decent second-try to contact someone who comes to NANOG, so the
next time we have a BOF the peering people can tell the security people
they should go.
