[52326] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: i think terroists are going to love ipv6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Stephen J. Wilcox)
Wed Sep 25 17:20:50 2002
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 22:20:13 +0100 (BST)
From: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve@opaltelecom.co.uk>
To: Joe Baptista <baptista@dot-god.com>
Cc: Jim Segrave <jes@nl.demon.net>,
Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>, nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0209250900080.1530-100000@dot-god.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
RFC1925 Part 2.4
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Joe Baptista wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Jim Segrave wrote:
>
> > > who cares. China is not aware of the security implications to the
> > > homeland. china is after all a nation ruled by madarines. the colours of
> > > authority change with the wind but the rules of the mandarine class has
> > > not ended. order is critical to the natural balance of chiness society.
> > >
> > > ipv6 challenges order. so what will the nat wall of china do now. i
> > > shall of course be investigating. i think icann goes to china next ;)
> >
> > Could further nonsense in this direction please be sent to a newsgroup
> > like alt.test please?
> >
> > Nanog is hardly the place for such incisive analysis of the current
> > political order or social structures of China.
> >
> > And it's Mandarin. Capitalized even. Which suggests the depth of
> > research which has obviously gone into this.
>
> hey - the chiness are a speciality of mine ;)
>
> lynx www.dot-god.com/bod/jb/chinasponsor.html
>
> and these are issues that we are going to have to deal with. and it's no
> picnic for the people who have to manage ipv6 infrastructure. the chines
> are the least of our concerns.
>
> cheers
> joe baptista
>
> p.s. i still have no idea where the fantasy in my article exists. so far
> i just see i-society complaints of madness but no substance.
>
>
>
