[52191] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Cogent service
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Schwartz)
Thu Sep 19 16:26:02 2002
From: David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com>
To: <ml@vayner.net>, <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 13:25:29 -0700
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209192235020.31484-100000@staff.netvision.net.il>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002 22:35:48 +0300 (IDT), Arie Vayner wrote:
>Does anyone have any comments (good or bad) about Cognet as a=
transit
>provider in New York?
>They seem to be too cheap.
>
>Arie
=09We use them. They work, they're reliable, they keep their=
promises, and
their NOC is incredibly responsive during denial of service=
attacks or other
problems.
=09My only complaint is that if you need anything customized at=
all, they just
won't do it. They script and standardize everything. At one=
point, we needed
one slight configuration change to a machine colocated at our=
office that
wouldn't affect anyone but us. They admitted we needed it and=
couldn't get
the affect any other way, but just couldn't do it. "That's not=
the product we
offer."
=09DS
