[51851] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IP address fee??
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Stephen J. Wilcox)
Mon Sep 9 06:10:15 2002
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 11:08:49 +0100 (BST)
From: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve@opaltelecom.co.uk>
To: cw <security@fidei.co.uk>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <E17oLMD-000DQu-00@serenity.mcc.ac.uk>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, cw wrote:
>
> On Mon, 9 Sep 2002 10:06:29 +0100 (BST), Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
> >
> >Really? So a customer who claims to need a /24 on a dialup doesnt
> >suggest to you that they're wrong or at least worthy of further
> >investigation before you assign it?
>
> The original sender said "justify" not "claim".
Misread that a little :) it is more aimed at the first poster then not the one I
responded to!
Well my point is that justify or claim I'd pay more attention to the seemingly
ok /24 request on a dialup than I would to one for an OC3.
