[51844] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IP address fee??
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bdragon@gweep.net)
Sun Sep 8 17:38:52 2002
To: chris@westnet.com (Christopher X. Candreva)
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2002 17:38:19 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0209051623200.27384-100000@westnet> from "Christopher X. Candreva" at Sep 05, 2002 04:27:41 PM
From: <bdragon@gweep.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> Shane:
>
> I think an important question would be what level of service are they
> buying. Including 255 address with a T3 would be very reasonable, less so
> with a T1, not very reasonable with DSL, and ridiculous with a dial-up
> account.
How is usage need in any way related to circuit size? This kind of allocation
policy amazes me.
A dialup that can justify a /24 is no different than an OC3 customer
who can't. Each customer should (only) get the space they can justify,
and circuit size is not a justification.
