[51805] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Vulnerbilities of Interconnection
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jared Mauch)
Fri Sep 6 14:23:15 2002
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 14:20:28 -0400
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.Nether.net>
To: batz <batsy@vapour.net>
Cc: Pawlukiewicz Jane <pawlukiewicz_jane@bah.com>, alex@yuriev.com,
"nanog@merit.edu" <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0209061341410.30102-100000@vapour.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 01:55:40PM -0400, batz wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Pawlukiewicz Jane wrote:
> :would be difficult to reach. I'd have to run a model to be sure, but
> :every one of the major seven have rerouting methodologies that would
> :recover from the loss. And I don't think they exclusively peer at
>
> ASN's to "fail", then see who is still connected, but we are
> still dealing with connectivity relatve to us and our peers,
> even 5+ AS-hops away.
>
> I would imagine this is one of the tasks CAIDA.org is probably
> working on, as it seems to fall within their mission.
Coming up with the as interconnection data is actaully fairly
easy if you parse route-views data. This obviously doesn't cover
every possible interconnection that exists but it does provide
a large swath of data to review for the interconnection
postulation.
Looking at that data, (this is an old snapshot) the top ten
networks are: (in #10->#1 order)
conn ASN
----+----
161 3356
229 1
242 2914
248 209
274 6461
277 3561
295 3549
328 7018
484 701
493 1239
- Jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
