[5179] in North American Network Operators' Group
Intra/Inter - was Inet-II
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bill Manning)
Thu Oct 10 20:45:04 1996
From: bmanning@ISI.EDU (Bill Manning)
To: salo@msc.edu (Tim Salo)
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 1996 17:39:57 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: avg@quake.net, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <199610102131.QAA11504@uh.msc.edu> from "Tim Salo" at Oct 10, 96 04:31:45 pm
> > Date: Thu, 10 Oct 1996 14:16:53 -0700
> > From: Vadim Antonov <avg@quake.net>
> > To: kwe@6SigmaNets.com, swolff@cisco.com
> > Subject: Re: Internet II is coming...
> > Cc: mathis@psc.edu, nanog@merit.edu
> > [...]
> > Oh, no, not AUP again!
> >
> > What a mess.
>
> I don't think so, really.
>
> This time around, the AUP will not be at the functional core of the
> Internet, plus most people will be on the AUP-free side of things.
>
> -tjs
Hi again,
Please note that firewalls, Intranets, Market-segment
nets (eg ANX, Inet-II, and the raft of MRNs) all are
there -because- of AUPs. And yes it is a mess and
it creates business opportunities and things would
be much better if we could all get along and do things
-my- way. :)
AUPs are a fact of life. We (as a community) have
to figure out how to deal with support of thousands
of AUPs in a global internet.
Just my 0.02 rembi.
--
--bill
