[51787] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: classless delegation [Re: IP address fee??]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Peter van Dijk)
Fri Sep 6 11:11:37 2002
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 17:11:05 +0200
From: Peter van Dijk <peter@dataloss.nl>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Mail-Followup-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <a05200507b99e715aa3f7@[10.0.1.60]>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 04:56:09PM +0200, Brad Knowles wrote:
[snip]
> > I am doing separate zone files. Each IP delegated to me is a separate
> > zone. Now, again, what is wrong with that?
>
> Technically, nothing -- at least, with the absolute latest
> authoritative nameservers and the absolute latest recursive/caching
> nameservers, and it doesn't seem to give much problems to modern
> resolver libraries.
>
['it will break with lots of software']
I am very willing to believe everything that you are saying, but *what
part* of my configuration breaks those nameservers?
> >> o The reverse zone contains one or more A records
> >> The reverse domain "192.122.109.193.in-addr.arpa." contains one
> >> or more A records. A records should only be placed in
> >> forward-mapping domains.
> >
> > What A-records is it talking about? I am not seeing any.
>
> They are the ones associated with your NS records. At a
> procedural level, PTR records are mutually exclusive with SOA & NS
> records.
But there are no A records in that zone. Again, what A-records?
I have, by the way, enabled AXFR to the world for my reverse zones
(all 16), so feel free to have a look.
Also, I am aware that the hostmaster-address in the SOA for these
zones is bogus - I will fix that shortly.
Greetz, Peter
--
peter@dataloss.nl | http://www.dataloss.nl/ | Undernet:#clue
