[51765] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IP address fee??
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brad Knowles)
Fri Sep 6 08:35:49 2002
In-Reply-To: <20020906091124.GF60246@dataloss.nl>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 14:21:35 +0200
To: Peter van Dijk <peter@dataloss.nl>
From: Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
At 11:11 AM +0200 2002/09/06, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> And you can do it even easier without RFC2317:
>
>http://homepages.tesco.net/~J.deBoynePollard/FGA/avoid-rfc-2317-delegation.html
Nope. Fundamentally broken. Delegations must occur at the apex of a zone.
Trying to take advantage of certain mis-features in current
versions of BIND does not excuse you from being responsible for doing
the job properly in the first place, because you can be assured that
future versions of BIND will most likely fix this "feature".
--
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.
GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E W+++(--) N+ !w---
O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++)
tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)
