[51738] in North American Network Operators' Group
[Fwd: Re: IP address fee??]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Manolo Hernandez)
Thu Sep 5 16:13:12 2002
From: Manolo Hernandez <manolo@dialtone.com>
To: Nanog <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: 05 Sep 2002 16:05:03 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--=-ICkYUsXKF0gyCXYfDBLH
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
--=-ICkYUsXKF0gyCXYfDBLH
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Description: Forwarded message - Re: IP address fee??
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Subject: Re: IP address fee??
From: Manolo Hernandez <manolo@dialtone.com>
To: Tony Tauber <ttauber@genuity.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.40.0209051428260.664-100000@mesa.bbnplanet.com>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.40.0209051428260.664-100000@mesa.bbnplanet.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8
Date: 05 Sep 2002 14:30:34 -0400
Message-Id: <1031250634.1838.7.camel@manolo.local.dialtone.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
I base my allocations on the customers necessity not what they request.
ARIN can get picky when you go back for address space and you allocate a
/24 and the customer only uses a 30 ips..
Regards,
Manolo
On Thu, 2002-09-05 at 14:33, Tony Tauber wrote:
>
> On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 01:36:27PM -0400, Derek Samford wrote:
> > > Shane,
> > > There is a practice on that (At least here.).
> > > Generally we provide a Class C to our customers at no
> > > additional charge, but we have
> >
> > Why in this day and age, 9 years after the invention of CIDR, are we
> > still refering to "class C"'s?
>
> At least as importantly, why do 254 addresses get provided where the
> actual need might not warrant that quantity?
>
> Tony
>
>
--
Manolo Hernandez - Network Administrator
Dialtone Internet - Extremely Fast Linux Web Servers
phone://954-581-0097 fax://954-581-7629
mailto:manolo@dialtone.com http://www.dialtone.com
"The only source of knowledge is experience." - A. Einstein
--=-ICkYUsXKF0gyCXYfDBLH--
