[51723] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IP address fee??
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tony Tauber)
Thu Sep 5 14:34:56 2002
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 14:33:45 -0400 (EDT)
From: Tony Tauber <ttauber@genuity.net>
To: Richard A Steenbergen <ras@e-gerbil.net>
Cc: Derek Samford <dsamford@fastduck.net>,
"'Owens, Shane (EPIK.ORL)'" <sowens@epik.net>, <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <20020905174820.GU53265@overlord.e-gerbil.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 01:36:27PM -0400, Derek Samford wrote:
> > Shane,
> > There is a practice on that (At least here.).
> > Generally we provide a Class C to our customers at no
> > additional charge, but we have
>
> Why in this day and age, 9 years after the invention of CIDR, are we
> still refering to "class C"'s?
At least as importantly, why do 254 addresses get provided where the
actual need might not warrant that quantity?
Tony
