[51655] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: AT&T NYC
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
Tue Sep 3 15:33:21 2002
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 21:31:31 +0200 (CEST)
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
To: <alex@yuriev.com>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10209031459240.4454-100000@s1.yuriev.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002 alex@yuriev.com wrote:
> > That's the part I can't figure out without some lab time either, but
> > obviously you can tweak this setup to _statically_ do whatever it is you
> > need, the only question is what happens when something goes down.
> route-map internal-link permit 10
> match blah
> set metric +10
> do blah
Yes, now I see it. Under normal circumstances this doesn't make sense
since IBGP doesn't "see" the infrastructure between to BGP routers, but in
this setup each router adds to the MED metric so it works more or less the
same as an OSPF or IS-IS metric.
Iljitsch van Beijnum
