[51640] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: AT&T NYC
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jesper Skriver)
Tue Sep 3 11:18:46 2002
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 17:18:02 +0200
From: Jesper Skriver <jesper@skriver.dk>
To: Clayton Fiske <clay@bloomcounty.org>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Mail-Followup-To: Jesper Skriver <jesper@skriver.dk>,
Clayton Fiske <clay@bloomcounty.org>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20020903075503.GA67920@bloomcounty.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 12:55:03AM -0700, Clayton Fiske wrote:
> Links and loopbacks => IGP
Why on earth does you want your link addresses in your IGP ?
Sometimes it cannot be avoided, due to bad implementation, but why do
you need it ?
Allways use loopback addresses for BGP next-hop, then all you need is
the loopback addresses in your IGP.
/Jesper
--
Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)skriver(dot)dk - CCIE #5456
Senior network engineer @ AS3292, TDC Tele Danmark
One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them,
One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them.
