[51546] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NYCrouting )
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jason Lixfeld)
Thu Aug 29 16:02:14 2002
From: "Jason Lixfeld" <jlixfeld@andromedas.com>
To: "'Ralph Doncaster'" <ralph@istop.com>,
"'Robert A. Hayden'" <rhayden@geek.net>
Cc: "'Peter van Dijk'" <peter@dataloss.nl>, <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 15:58:49 -0400
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0208291544260.32063-100000@cpu1693.adsl.bellglobal.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Uhh, come to think of it, the term reverse route reflecting probably
won't get you much help -- client to client route reflecting is probably
an easier term to understand.. My bad.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On
> Behalf Of Ralph Doncaster
> Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 3:46 PM
> To: Robert A. Hayden
> Cc: Peter van Dijk; nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NYCrouting )
>
>
>
> On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Robert A. Hayden wrote:
>
> > Um. Set up more than one reflector....
>
> So how many is enough? I would think 3 is a minimum to come
> close to the
> reliability/redundancy of OSPF.
>
> -Ralph
>
