[5154] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Make Money Fast (Internet II )

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ehud Gavron)
Wed Oct 9 21:20:44 1996

Date: Wed, 09 Oct 1996 17:55:57 -0700 (MST)
From: Ehud Gavron <GAVRON@ACES.COM>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Cc: GAVRON@ACES.COM

I work 80 hours a week not only because I'm an IP engineer*, but also because
I'm a consultant and a business owner of an ISP.

If there will be an Internet II, I see LOTS AND LOTS of opportunities for any
person with a brain, and even some CNEs.

For an Internet II to be designed, implemented, maintained, connected to
R&E sites all over the country, and successfully, LOTS of consulting dollars
are going to be spent.  As someone who actually understands packets, headers,
routing, etc. I suspect I'll be quite busy.  This is good.

For an Internet II to be successful, it will HAVE to be interconnected to
The Internet.  (That's "Internet I" in "Internet II"-Speak).  These 
interconnects will include cool things like "settlements" and other 
phone-speak some of us have been fighting since 1985, or they will provide
lots of unrestricted fed-funds to commercial ISPs.  (can you guess which one
I think's going to happen.)  THIS TOO is a golden business opportunity.

In short, who cares whether academia dreamed this up or not.  Who cares if
it will work tomorrow with 8ms coast-to-coast (Thanks, Vadim, for bringing
physics into it ;) or whether or not it will be instantly perfect like
the Internet is ^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^ the first time at sex ^H^H^H^H^H^H
like Star Trek I ^H^H^H^H^H^H^H well, like something that's instantly
perfect the first time, even though I can't come up with any examples.

No, this is not a feel-good note.  This is just my way of saying "It's
been rather quiet on NANOG, and Internet II's only connection to NANOG
is how we work with/interconnect/plan such a network.  Not whether
academicians ought to shave and get real jobs."

Ehud

* Ob rant: I'm tired of guys who've ``practiced'' cisco ``scripts'' and
  call themselves IP engineers.  They ``know'' something because they've
  seen it before -- not because they understand it, could engineer it
  differently, or could do the underlying concepts under a different
  paradigm.  I realize we can't all know everything, but I'm really
  tired of those who know nothing and have humongous egos.


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post