[51372] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Mon Aug 26 15:27:47 2002
To: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 26 Aug 2002 21:12:40 +0200."
<009d01c24d34$8cc23090$420d640a@unfix.org>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 15:27:05 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_-1895849786P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002 21:12:40 +0200, Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org> said:
> IMHO, Paul's idea is quite a good one, but all servers will need to be
> upgraded, and all dns entries installed.
Given the number of providers who seem to think ingress and/or rfc1918
filtering shouldn't be done, what makes you think that "all servers"
will be upgraded to support THIS proposal?
(If you don't want to re-start the RFC1918 war, feel free to substitute ANY
OTHER thing that most people think is a Good Thing, but we've seen some
sizable minority not deploy for reasons they consider perfectly valid).
--
Valdis Kletnieks
Computer Systems Senior Engineer
Virginia Tech
--==_Exmh_-1895849786P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQE9aoEJcC3lWbTT17ARAq6aAKDvf+GlQ1VqfIAImjC7iigW46fUmACfTcAY
Gp9Kv5gvTy/kuHuGxHbRik4=
=UMH7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_-1895849786P--
