[51124] in North American Network Operators' Group
Eliminating physical colocation (was Re: Shared facilities)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sean Donelan)
Wed Aug 21 13:51:48 2002
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 13:51:17 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sean Donelan <sean@donelan.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.0.20020821032807.01b771b0@ns1.outland.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Martin Hannigan wrote:
> Since Sept 11, my experience probably doesn't cut the mustard, but that's
> how it has been to this point.
Consider the various public statements on colocation security.
http://www.state.ma.us/dpu/catalog/6688.htm
"Verizon MA believes that the most effective means of ensuring network
safety and reliability is to eliminate physical collocation entirely in
all its COs, converting existing physical collocation arrangements to
virtual and requiring that all future collocation arrangements be
virtual only."
Of course, this is a very different colocation model than used by
companies such as Equinix. Just because they use the same terms doesn't
make them the same thing.
