[51079] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: your mail
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alex Rubenstein)
Tue Aug 20 14:18:19 2002
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 14:17:18 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
From: Alex Rubenstein <alex@nac.net>
To: Nathan Stratton <nathan@robotics.net>
Cc: Ali Jackson <l3xusgal@hotmail.com>,
"nanog@merit.edu" <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0208201405200.21013-100000@Barney.robotics.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Yes.
Equinix security, while it looks very tough, is very easy to social
engineer.
Too much fluff, need more stuff.
On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Nathan Stratton wrote:
>
> On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Ali Jackson wrote:
>
> > Does any one else out there think smart hands at Equinix is a rip off? I
> > can send a package over night to the IBX for less than what it costs to
> > move it from the mailroom to my cage. Just curious....
>
> Uh, yes. Equinix is a rip off in general. I got kicked out of Chicago
> using the side door. I was sick of the stupid man trap crap and noticed
> they had a door that was propped open in the back that leads outside. It
> was much easier to back the truck up there and go in and out. The whole
> thing is a joke, they spent a lot of cash to look good, but there is very
> little substance.
>
>
> ><>
> Nathan Stratton
> nathan at robotics.net
> http://www.robotics.net
>
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, alex@nac.net, latency, Al Reuben --
-- Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
