[50912] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brad Knowles)
Wed Aug 14 19:26:59 2002
In-Reply-To: <3D59AC09.6090001@yahoo-inc.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 00:44:08 +0200
To: Doug Barton <DougB@yahoo-inc.com>, fithen@networksplus.net
From: Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
At 6:02 PM -0700 2002/08/13, Doug Barton wrote:
>> Is this sensitive info?
>
> Given that I saw this on the history channel the other night, I'd
> say no. :)
One of the lessons we were taught in our security briefings was
that just because something was publicly discussed somewhere (e.g.,
on a television show or in the newspaper) does not automatically make
the information unclassified.
I personally know of classified data that has been leaked and
published in print, and that's about all I'll say on that particular
subject.
However, with respect to the windows and the masking system, I
have not been told that this information is classified or sensitive.
--
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.
GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E W+++(--) N+ !w---
O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++)
tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)
