[50786] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: your mail
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (JC Dill)
Fri Aug 9 02:04:17 2002
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2002 23:02:30 -0700
To: Scott Granados <scott@graphidelix.net>,
Ukyo Kuonji <kawaii_iinazuke@hotmail.com>
From: JC Dill <nanog@vo.cnchost.com>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0208081441090.14503-100000@penguin.graphidel
ix.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On 02:42 PM 8/8/02, Scott Granados wrote:
>
>Do people really almost get fired for what they write here?
Sometimes, it's not "almost". Just 3 months ago:
<http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/2002-05/msg00208.html>
>I would like to take this opportunity to publicly shame eBay, who decided
>to fire one of their engineers for disclosing their "proprietary" methods
>for defending against DoS in the recent NANOG thread.
jc
> I'd think
>there would be more constructive things to do by management than read
>nanog for questionable posts. If I were managing someone and they
>posted their feeling on a subject and clearly said it was their own who
>am I to have a problem with that. It might be in my best interest and
>listen to them then silence them.
>
>On Thu, 8 Aug 2002, Ukyo Kuonji wrote:
>
>>
>> Sorry, but there are valid reasons for posting anonymously. As one person
>> that almost got fired from a company for expressing what was clearly
marked
>> as his own opinion to this list, I can attest to this. Some employers are
>> concerned that you post during working hours, some are concerned that you
>> use a work address, some are concerned that anything you say, no matter
what
>> email you use, will be considered as representations of the company's
>> direction, even if it is clearly marked as not.
>>
>> I like helping and sharing my opinions, but I'm not willing to loose my
job
>> over it.
>>
>> UK
>>
>> >Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 00:13:22 -0400 (EDT)
>> >From: Brian Wallingford <brian@meganet.net>
>> >
>> >Perhaps it's time to bar posting privileges from those who insist on
>> >remaining entirely anonymous?
>> >
>> >I doubt that anyone who has anything substantive to offer would need to
>> >use a hushmail/yahoo/etc. return address.
>> >
>> >The initial posts from Bandy, Vaul, et al were mildly amusing at first,
>> >but the novelty wore out very quickly.
>>
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
>>
