[50718] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: operational context? Re: signature
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Scott Granados)
Wed Aug 7 20:43:25 2002
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 17:42:52 -0700 (PDT)
From: Scott Granados <scott@graphidelix.net>
To: Jim Mercer <jim@pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis.ca>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20020808002530.GF55653@pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis.ca>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Hmmm, do pgp sig's count and aren't they longer?
I still like the idea that using longer sigs will use up extra unused
fiber:)
On Wed, 7 Aug 2002, Jim
Mercer wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 12:51:18AM +0200, Brad Knowles wrote:
> > At 6:28 PM -0400 2002/08/07, William Warren wrote:
> > > My sig is now 4 lines.
> >
> > It's not just the total number of lines. It's also about the
> > number of characters on each line -- .sigs should generally be
> > wrapped at 72-75 characters, just like e-mail messages.
>
> i'm certainly glad the moderator of the list is watching to make sure
> people don't drone on endlessly about such non-operational issues such as
> SPAM.
>
> the length of one's signature and/or expressing one's religious
> beliefs must have some obscure operational context.
>
> --jim
> fully expecting to have posting privileges revoked for another 6 months.
>
