[50691] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Phil Rosenthal)
Wed Aug 7 15:55:20 2002
Reply-To: <pr@isprime.com>
From: "Phil Rosenthal" <pr@isprime.com>
To: <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>,
"'Derek Samford'" <dsamford@fastduck.net>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 15:54:45 -0400
In-Reply-To: <200208071517.g77FHAqH003426@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
I agree that the thread needs to die.
Anything useful that could be said has been said.
The end result is, the proper thing to do is make sure your upstream
allows you to announce any more specifics than what you have in the IRR.
Use your best judgment in deaggregating, and it is always better if you
can get it fixed by having the offending party stop announcing, or their
uplinks filter.
--Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On Behalf Of
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2002 11:17 AM
To: Derek Samford
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes
On Wed, 07 Aug 2002 10:48:00 EDT, Derek Samford said:
> Please...Let this thread just die.
Well.. if the Routing Nazis were doing their jobs, this thread wouldn't
be necessary. ;)
Godwin. :)
