[50596] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: If you have nothing to hide
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Scott Weeks)
Mon Aug 5 16:03:12 2002
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2002 09:57:46 -1000 (HST)
From: Scott Weeks <surfer@mauislanwanman.com>
To: Sean Donelan <sean@donelan.com>
Cc: Dave Crocker <dhc2@dcrocker.net>, <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.40.0208041938430.4260-100000@clifden.donelan.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Sun, 4 Aug 2002, Sean Donelan wrote:
[snip]
: > Diverse input to a government process can be good for learning about
: > choices, but consensus views should be helpful for making them.
:
: What group is the best forum for developing consensus views on
: Internet operation policy issues?
:
: One of the Mr. Clarke's complaints in his speech was there is no group
: the government can go to find out what the consensus view of Internet
: operators is. IETF doesn't appear to want to take on that role. NANOG
: isn't structured to develop policies for ISPs. IOPS, ICANN, ISPSEC, etc
: have issues. ATIS, ITU, NRIC, NSTAC would love to take on the role.
:
: The National Cybersecurity Plan (or whatever the final name ends up) will
: be announced in September. The next NANOG meeting is October 27-29. The
: next IETF meeting is November 17-21.
Invite him and/or members of his team to NANOG...
scott
