[50543] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Is the PAIX Palo Alto taking a dump?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Lane Patterson)
Fri Aug 2 17:55:42 2002
From: Lane Patterson <lpatterson@equinix.com>
To: "'Scott Granados'" <scott@graphidelix.net>,
Peter van Dijk <peter@dataloss.nl>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 14:55:06 -0700
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
But LINX, Equinix, and other exchanges have been very stable on Foundry
running both layer 2 and layer 3 code images. So I don't think all the
blame falls on Foundry. I think a rigorous hardware/software support plan,
aggressive management of vendor support, sufficient test lab, and
conservative upgrade process are just as essential to stability.
Of course what I really want for Xmas is a Force10 box ;-)
Cheers,
-Lane
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Granados [mailto:scott@graphidelix.net]
> Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 8:12 PM
> To: Peter van Dijk
> Cc: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: Re: Is the PAIX Palo Alto taking a dump?
>
>
>
> Its extreme I believe.
>
> Black Diamonds?
> On Fri, 2 Aug 2002, Peter van Dijk wrote:
>
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 10:03:12AM -0700, Stephen Stuart wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > They were; hopefully you mailed them and received an
> answer to that
> > > effect. A software fault took down one of the switches,
> and the vendor
> > > is being made aware of the problem they need to fix.
> >
> > Given all the trouble AMS-IX has with Foundry, I'd like to
> know: what
> > vendor is that?
> >
> > Greetz, Peter
> >
>
