[50375] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: solving problems instead of beating heads on walls [was: something
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ralph Doncaster)
Sat Jul 27 10:24:39 2002
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2002 10:26:24 -0400 (EDT)
From: Ralph Doncaster <ralph@istop.com>
To: Joe Provo <joe.provo@rcn.com>
Cc: "nanog@merit.edu" <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20020727100444.A25874@noc.ultra.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> If you want to run seperate networks, run separate networks. Different
> ASes, the whole 9 yards; perhaps a re-reading of rfc1930 is in order?
That brings us back to the discussion of PI space. If de-aggregating my
/20 didn't work, then I'd either inefficiently use IP space in order to
qualify for 2 /20's, or buy a defunct ISP or 2 to get a bunch of /24's in
the 192-223 space.
Are you suggesting that either of those (which don't violate any
RFCs) options are better than de-aggregating my /20?
-Ralph
