[50257] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: debugging packet loss
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Phil Rosenthal)
Tue Jul 23 14:26:36 2002
Reply-To: <pr@isprime.com>
From: "Phil Rosenthal" <pr@isprime.com>
To: <jlewis@packetnexus.com>, <ralph@istop.com>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 14:23:59 -0400
In-Reply-To: <49487.192.168.120.228.1027448238.squirrel@www.packetnexus.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
---
From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On Behalf Of
Jason Lewis
Isn't ping the first thing to be dropped in favor of other traffic? I
remember a similar issue and Cisco saying that was the behavior. Don't
quote me on that.
jas
---
Even if it is, that still means that other packets could be lost had
those pings not been there.
--Phil
