[50143] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IGP metrics on WAN links
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Me)
Fri Jul 19 16:12:06 2002
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 14:11:29 -0600 (MDT)
From: Me <smentzer@mentzer.org>
To: Joe Abley <jabley@automagic.org>
Cc: Sush Bhattarai <netnews@sush.org>, <nanog@merit.edu>,
Tom Holbrook <tomhol@corp.earthlink.net>
In-Reply-To: <20020719195849.GB86634@felix.automagic.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
I think you missed part of his comment:
" of course there are always some "twinking" done regularly to give higher
priorities to the higher bandwidth, link condition etc"
so fiber mileage is just the base, with modifications to make it work
correctly, based on bandwidth, etc.
On Fri, 19 Jul 2002, Joe Abley
wrote:
> Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 12:58:50 -0700
> From: Joe Abley <jabley@automagic.org>
> To: Sush Bhattarai <netnews@sush.org>
> Cc: nanog@merit.edu, Tom Holbrook <tomhol@corp.earthlink.net>
> Subject: Re: IGP metrics on WAN links
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2002 at 02:25:16PM -0400, Sush Bhattarai wrote:
> > Think most ISPs use actual fiber miles
>
> That seems unlikely to me. Do you really want your intra-AS traffic
> to always follow a short OC3 in preference to a long OC48?
>
>
> Joe
>
-sean
Spoon!
