[50100] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: verio arrogance
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (up@3.am)
Thu Jul 18 16:22:18 2002
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 16:18:09 -0400 (EDT)
From: <up@3.am>
To: Ralph Doncaster <ralph@istop.com>
Cc: "nanog@merit.edu" <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0207181553160.11967-100000@cpu1693.adsl.bellglobal.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Thu, 18 Jul 2002, Ralph Doncaster wrote:
> And your suggestion has technical deficiencies as well. I have a leased
> line between Toronto and Ottawa, so I want to announce my Ottawa IPs to my
> Toronto transit provider as well as an Ottawa transit provider. And the
> reverse for the Toronto IPs. My understand is trying to punch holes in PA
> space is much more difficult than de-aggregating ARIN PI space.
I can't really see why, as long as the provider has punched the
appropriate hole for your aggregate in their filters. More specific
routes always win out. Or am I missing your point?
James Smallacombe PlantageNet, Inc. CEO and Janitor
up@3.am http://3.am
=========================================================================
