[49698] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: multicast (was Re: Readiness for IPV6)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Niels Bakker)
Tue Jul 9 11:22:19 2002
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 17:21:54 +0200
From: Niels Bakker <niels=nanog@bakker.net>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Mail-Followup-To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20020709145147.GA28252@ussenterprise.ufp.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
* bicknell@ufp.org (Leo Bicknell) [Tue 09 Jul 2002, 16:52 CEST]:
> I'll be the first to jump on the multicast bandwagon, but I don't
> work for an eyeball provider. The first adopters need to be DSL
> and cable modem providers, to the end user, on by default. Then
> we can go somewhere.
And when approached they'll claim that it'll melt their infrastructure -
and they'll be right in a lot of cases. PPPoE and multicast still
causes a traffic explosion that multicast was supposed to remove.
When I was employed by a company deploying FTTH our vendor was working
on a hack they named "multicast VLAN" to avoid a similar situation.
No idea if they ever finished it (they weren't too keen with making
deadlines, in my admittedly short-lived experience).
-- Niels.
