[49492] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Sprint peering policy
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Stephen J. Wilcox)
Tue Jul 2 09:04:38 2002
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 14:02:43 +0100 (BST)
From: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve@opaltelecom.co.uk>
To: Giles Heron <giles@packetexchange.net>
Cc: "Grant A. Kirkwood" <grant@tnarg.org>, pr@isprime.com,
nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <1025616855.1555.21.camel@gizpad>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
The original comment I made was regarding the amount of traffic people suggest
they have on their networks.
I know UU, L3, Sprint, Verio etc will carry many gigabits but it was concerning
the average list member rather than the exceptional major player...
Answers so far vary..
Steve
On 2 Jul 2002, Giles Heron wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2002-07-02 at 02:00, Grant A. Kirkwood wrote:
> >
> > At 09:54 PM 7/1/2002 -0400, Phil Rosenthal wrote:
> >
> > >My math shows ~500bps per US citizen:
> > >Assuming 150,000,000,000 bits and 280,000,000 citizens.
> >
> > This also assumes US citizens don't sleep.
>
> and that non-US citizens never send traffic through the US or send
> traffic to/from servers in the US.
>
> Given that traffic from Europe to Asia almost always goes via the US,
> and given that it isn't unheard of for traffic between major European
> ASs to go via the US (e.g. 702 and 9057 right now) then the former
> assumption is clearly untrue.
>
> I think the fact that I'm sending this invalidates the second one?
>
> Giles
>
>
> > --
> > Grant A. Kirkwood - grant(at)tnarg.org
> > Fingerprint = D337 48C4 4D00 232D 3444 1D5D 27F6 055A BF0C 4AED
> >
> >
>
