[49459] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Sprint peering policy (fwd)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (E.B. Dreger)
Mon Jul 1 17:12:42 2002
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 21:12:17 +0000 (GMT)
From: "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net>
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <GPEOJKGHAMKFIOMAGMDIIEJCMKAA.deepak@ai.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
DJ> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 16:58:10 -0400
DJ> From: Deepak Jain
DJ> You achieve price symmetry when push/pull ratios match or
DJ> approach each other because the amount of bits x distance for
DJ> each party is more equal. This is what many tier-1's would
DJ> consider an equal peering relationship.
Alternatively, two providers could peer via a { cell | packet }-
switched fabric, splitting the cost.
ISP1: NYC, SJC, CHI
ISP2: LAX, SJC, SEA
A cloud connects the five cities. ISP1 and ISP2 split the cost,
and exchange traffic via the cloud. Suddenly traffic ratios
become less important, and traffic levels become the primary
justification metric.
Eddy
--
Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
From: A Trap <blacklist@brics.com>
To: blacklist@brics.com
Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.
These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots.
Do NOT send mail to <blacklist@brics.com>, or you are likely to
be blocked.
