|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 15:41:43 -0400 From: Richard A Steenbergen <ras@e-gerbil.net> To: Phil Rosenthal <pr@isprime.com> Cc: nanog@merit.edu In-Reply-To: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAA/zNkI7d3EEmn3+v5DgN/l8KAAAAQAAAA4pCCZ8LP5026E74U6Ake/wEAAAAA@isprime.com> Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 01:38:57PM -0400, Phil Rosenthal wrote: > > I would venture to say that to WorldCom, all traffic is destined to a > peer, or a customer, and they NEVER pay for traffic. Peering with them > is entirely a courtesy from them to you, as they can always see you > through their current peers. I think you missed the definition of "tier 1"... Oh wait, we're all using made-up definitions anyways. Nevermind. > The fact that they failed, having had such extensive peering, proves > that peering has no relation to financial difficulties (in my mind, at > least) You are one very confused individual. -- Richard A Steenbergen <ras@e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras PGP Key ID: 0x138EA177 (67 29 D7 BC E8 18 3E DA B2 46 B3 D8 14 36 FE B6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |