[49423] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Sprint peering policy
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Lesher)
Mon Jul 1 13:51:40 2002
From: David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu (nanog list)
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 13:45:20 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <GPEOJKGHAMKFIOMAGMDIKEGGMKAA.deepak@ai.net> from "Deepak Jain" at Jul 01, 2002 01:26:16 PM
Reply-To: wb8foz@nrk.com
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Unnamed Administration sources reported that Deepak Jain said:
>
> Why would bankruptcies be a good reason to introduce regulation into peering
> or the Internet business?
The thing to fear is what's already happening; the fallen are
being bought by Monopoly-plAyers, anxious to get Back to whEre
they shaLL control all yet again.
You decide for yourself if {not} peering is part of that picture...
--
A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz@nrk.com
& no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
