[49351] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Sprint peering policy
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (E.B. Dreger)
Sat Jun 29 11:13:39 2002
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 15:11:14 +0000 (GMT)
From: "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net>
To: Richard A Steenbergen <ras@e-gerbil.net>
Cc: william@elan.net, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20020629141907.GM99199@overlord.e-gerbil.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
RAS> Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 10:19:07 -0400
RAS> From: Richard A Steenbergen
RAS> Think about it from the large tier 1's perspective. Lets say
RAS> you are Joe Sixpack ISP, and they peer with you in one
RAS> location. They now have to haul your traffic to and from
RAS> this one location, wasting expensive bandwidth on their
RAS> backbone.
Do they? Or might they peer using routes from the local point?
Perhaps Little ISP in Denver would happily peer with Large
Provider for Denver routes only.
Eddy
--
Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
From: A Trap <blacklist@brics.com>
To: blacklist@brics.com
Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.
These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots.
Do NOT send mail to <blacklist@brics.com>, or you are likely to
be blocked.
