[49325] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Sprint peering policy
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Vijay Gill)
Fri Jun 28 13:30:12 2002
To: "Daniel Golding" <dgolding@sockeye.com>
Cc: "Ralph Doncaster" <ralph@istop.com>, <nanog@merit.edu>
From: Vijay Gill <vgill@vijaygill.com>
Date: 28 Jun 2002 17:28:29 +0000
In-Reply-To: "Daniel Golding"'s message of "Thu, 27 Jun 2002 13:29:41 -0400"
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
"Daniel Golding" <dgolding@sockeye.com> writes:
> One is, Sprint won't peer with you. I'm not even sure who you work for, but
> rest assured, they will not peer with you. Time spent on this might be
> better utilized reading some of Bill Norton's excellent intro to peering
Dan, if you are a peer of sprint and I use the word peer as in:
1 : one that is of equal standing with another : EQUAL; especially :
one belonging to the same societal group especially based on age,
grade, or status
then I am sure things can happen.
Keeping the above definition of peering in mind, and not the current
accepted definition of what "peering" means, things suddenly become
crystal clear.
vijay "time to put back the peer in peering" gill
