[49307] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Sprint peering policy
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (E.B. Dreger)
Thu Jun 27 20:18:48 2002
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 00:17:49 +0000 (GMT)
From: "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net>
To: "nanog@merit.edu" <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0206271951450.17779-100000@cpu1693.adsl.bellglobal.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
RD> Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 20:00:11 -0400 (EDT)
RD> From: Ralph Doncaster
RD> For Chicago an OC3 connection to AADS would cost more than
RD> the long-haul back to Toronto.
Given as an example. However the cost/benefit plays out...
RD> I also prefer ethernet peering instead of ATM.
Agreed.
RD> Equinix looks like the best option in Chicago, but most
RD> long-haul carriers are in 600 Federal and not 350 Cermak.
For now, anyway.
RD> As for Akamai, I've found very little of my traffic (<5%) is
RD> Akamai.
Interesting. If you don't mind me asking, what is your total
traffic level, and how did you determine 5%?
Eddy
--
Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
From: A Trap <blacklist@brics.com>
To: blacklist@brics.com
Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.
These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots.
Do NOT send mail to <blacklist@brics.com>, or you are likely to
be blocked.
