[49277] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Sprint peering policy
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ralph Doncaster)
Thu Jun 27 15:00:50 2002
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 14:57:59 -0400 (EDT)
From: Ralph Doncaster <ralph@istop.com>
To: Daniel Golding <dgolding@sockeye.com>
Cc: "nanog@merit.edu" <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <GKEFKKIKGCMICPKBAEIMAEFLCIAA.dgolding@sockeye.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
I know Sprint won't peer with anyone small. I said in my inital post I
don't stand a chance - but who knows, at the rate OC48 prices are dropping
maybe next year I will meet the requirements. Attention K-Mart shoppers,
WorldCom OC48's on sale in isle 5. ;-)
> The second point is, whomever you spoke to has violated a non-disclosure
> agreement, one that is normally taken seriously. I would tread carefully in
> this area, as it may get whomever you spoke with in a significant amount of
> trouble.
I didn't post this until now since I was waiting for a couple opinions to
verify that it was in fact genuine, and as well a public filing that
anyone could get if they know where to dig at the FCC.
http://ns.istop.com/~ralph/2000-04-13-sprint.pdf
-Ralph
