[49219] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Sprint peering policy
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mitchell, Dan)
Wed Jun 26 14:58:37 2002
From: "Mitchell, Dan" <Dan.Mitchell@hosting.com>
To: "'Majdi S. Abbas'" <msa@samurai.sfo.dead-dog.com>,
"Mitchell, Dan" <Dan.Mitchell@hosting.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 14:57:07 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
RE: Majdi -- I just wanted to thoroughly address Alex's question.
Besides, Allegiance *has* to make it, because I certainly can't go get a job
at WCom anymore, can I? :-)
dem
-----Original Message-----
From: Majdi S. Abbas [mailto:msa@samurai.sfo.dead-dog.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 2:48 PM
To: Mitchell, Dan
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Sprint peering policy
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 02:34:42PM -0400, Mitchell, Dan wrote:
> a strong management team (after all, they *did* build MFS)
^
`- I think you have mistaken this for an endorsement.
And in the age of cooked books, stated revenue can be
misleading, particularly when it looks too good to be true.
I would be very wary of anyone in this business right now,
particularly a CLEC.
Regardless, I don't think shameless corporate plugs
really belong on NANOG, but I'll allow that perhaps I am in
the minority.
--msa
