home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 95 12:45 EDT From: Barney Wolff <barney@databus.com> To: Paul A Vixie <paul@vix.com>, nanog@merit.edu >Date: Thu, 27 Jul 1995 07:48:42 -0700 >From: Paul A Vixie <paul@vix.com> > >> The whole point of a name space is to make things easier to remember. > >This is the old invariant. It's varied. I'm still waiting for a proposal >for a hierarchy which will hold 25,000,000 names and still have them all >easy to remember, or easy to guess from external knowledge. > >The new "whole point of" the DNS name space is to provide names which change >less often than IP addresses change. If we could do just that we'd be winning. I'd like to question that 25e6 figure. It's one "mid-to-large" (to quote you) company in the US for every 10 inhabitants. Really? Is it perhaps a world figure instead? If we want a hash that's easy to compute from the company name, use the first three characters of the name, not something which requires external knowledge. It certainly does not solve the name-conflict problem, but it does provide sufficient division of the namespace to make the load on any one branch bearable, both for name service and for registration. Barney Wolff <barney@databus.com>
home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |