[48993] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: SPEWS?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (william@elan.net)
Thu Jun 20 16:24:20 2002
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 13:02:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: <william@elan.net>
To: <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.41.0206200840170.26229-100000@amethyst.nstc.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
I'v had similar problems as Alex with SPEW and also got the same reaction.
They have serious attitude problem. And no, SBC is not using SPEW, I
think they have their own blacklist based on actual incidents and I think
they are smart enough not to put themselve under legal risks for using SPEW.
> > Overzealous to say the least (i.e. without using language used by people
> > at spews
>
> Uh...
>
> Most of the people that were yelling at Alex probably had absolutely
> nothing to do with SPEWS. NANAE != SPEWS.
>
> > which by itself should already say something about how professional
> > they are). Its used primarily by very small sstem operators and I don't
> > know any isp of any serious size (i.e. over 1000 users or domains) that is
> > using them,
>
> I believe SBC's ISPs are.
>
>
>
> --
> Steve Sobol, CTO JustThe.net LLC, Mentor On The Lake, OH 888.480.4NET
> - I do my best work with one of my cockatiels sitting on each shoulder -
> 6/4/02:A USA TODAY poll found that 80% of Catholics advocated a
