[48986] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: SPEWS?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Thu Jun 20 16:03:51 2002
To: Sandy Harris <pashley@storm.ca>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 20 Jun 2002 14:33:18 EDT."
<3D121FEE.90EFDCB7@storm.ca>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 15:58:35 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_561451482P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002 14:33:18 EDT, Sandy Harris <pashley@storm.ca> said:
> > > If the offending ISP does not respond, and you have exhausted all avenues
> > > available to you to get the ISP to get its customer to stop spamming -
> > > whether by TOS'ing the customer, education or whatever -
>
> ... and you've waited a reasonable time ...
>
> Then the ISP is obviously either incompetent or deliberately aiding the
> spammers. Why should you even consider anything less than blacklisting
> every netblock the ISP has?
What do you do if the ISP says "We want to turn them off, but they've managed
to get a restraining order preventing us"? We've seen THAT before....
--
Valdis Kletnieks
Computer Systems Senior Engineer
Virginia Tech
--==_Exmh_561451482P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQE9EjPrcC3lWbTT17ARAhL+AKDkOfz/i29QXIMuh4/AuiKV+HV+NQCfbTi9
pIpf3ZJEX/xbLUYEVvKAZAU=
=wB0h
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_561451482P--
